- In the wake of mass killings in Iran, political insiders are discussing a "systemic coup" driven by conservatives and revolutionary forces to consolidate power.
- The term does not imply military force in the streets, but rather an internal reshuffling of authority amid mounting crises.
- The debate highlights a significant breach in the perception of unity and a dangerous decline in government legitimacy.
Historical Precedents
- The current climate mirrors the late 1980s, when war fatigue and Ayatollah Khomeini's declining health triggered intense behind-the-scenes negotiations for succession.
- The removal of designated successor Hossein Ali Montazeri and the maneuvers of figures like Hashemi Rafsanjani demonstrated how power was consolidated during periods of extreme stress.
- Accounts from foreign diplomats during that era mention a "white coup" intended to force a pivot toward diplomatic normalization and ceasefires.
Recurring Patterns of Elimination
- The Islamic Republic has a history of resolving crises through internal purges and the removal of rivals, ranging from the 1981 bombing of party headquarters to the 1990s "chain murders" of intellectuals.
- Deaths of prominent figures, such as Ahmad Khomeini (1995) and Rafsanjani (2017), remain politically sensitive, with official accounts failing to fully suppress public doubt.
- Post-2009, the focus shifted toward keeping internal enemies like Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi under check, signaling that crisis management is now synonymous with exclusion.
Modern Inflection Point
- Recent Israeli airstrikes and the death of military leaders have exposed intelligence failures and allegations of corruption, fueling public mistrust.
- Unlike the 1980s, the revolutionary fervor is gone, and the gap between the government and the grieving, disenfranchised public has widened.
- The state now faces a choice: initiate its own structural recalibration under pressure, or wait for unfolding events to force a shift in its power dynamics.