- The JAWBONE Act, introduced by Senators Ted Cruz and Ron Wyden, aims to penalize government officials who coerce private companies into censoring lawful speech.
- The legislation establishes a federal cause of action for individuals affected by such coercion and mandates a transparency system for government communications with platforms.
- EFF supports the bill, emphasizing the need to protect against "jawboning," where officials pressure tech firms to delete content or ban users.
Core Provisions and Goals
- The bill targets coercion directed at broadcasters, interactive computer services, and AI providers.
- It provides a new legal pathway for victims to sue the government in federal court, supplementing existing First Amendment protections.
- A key objective is to distinguish between unconstitutional coercion and legitimate, good-faith information-sharing between the government and private entities.
Case Study: ICEBlock
- EFF is currently representing Joshua Aaron, creator of the ICEBlock app, which allowed users to report local immigration enforcement activities.
- In June 2025, federal officials threatened Aaron with investigation and prosecution.
- By October 2025, the U.S. Attorney General pressured Apple to remove ICEBlock from its App Store, leading to the app's removal.
- EFF has filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit to uncover communications between the government and major platforms like Apple, Google, and Meta regarding the removal of such content.
Platform Autonomy
- EFF maintains that private companies possess their own First Amendment rights to curate and moderate user content, as affirmed in recent Supreme Court "Netchoice" decisions.
- The organization argues that defending this editorial independence is essential to prevent governments from dictating platform policy and controlling online discourse.
This summary was generated by AI from the original article and may omit nuance or later updates. How everytldr works