The Existential Risks of Israel's 'Greater Israel' Ambitions
Pressenza
- The "Greater Israel" vision promotes Israeli sovereignty across historical biblical territories, transforming esoteric theological claims into active state policy.
- The current Netanyahu-led government utilizes "annexation by a thousand cuts," including aggressive settlement expansion and military control, to prevent any viable future Palestinian state.
- This policy formalizes structural violence against Palestinians, which risks triggering widespread insurgency and regional instability due to the denial of basic rights and political representation.
Geopolitical and Moral Implications
- The project violates international legal tenets, including the prohibition of acquiring territory by force, thereby isolating Israel from a rules-based global order.
- Western allies face a strategic contradiction; permitting these policies risks undermining their own credibility and complicity in institutionalized injustice.
- By redefining Jewish identity through ethno-religious land dominance, the state risks detaching itself from classical ethical traditions, potentially harming global Jewish security.
Necessary International Action
- Allies must transition from rhetorical concern to concrete, punitive measures to prevent the collapse of prospects for peace.
- Demands for an immediate end to settlement expansion and conditionality on military aid based on annexation halts.
- Economic sanctions on products sourced from illegal settlements and support for international accountability bodies like the ICC.
- Increased diplomatic and financial support for Palestinian civil society and human rights organizations, alongside downgraded diplomatic relations from Arab states involved in peace treaties.